Points to Ponder:

The willingness of the scientific community to accept any new idea is usually determined by "source" rather than "substance;" that is, who said it is considered to be far more important than what was actually said. Which attitude, to me, comes very close to outright insanity. [Arthur Jones]

Cheering for Deficits (L. Brent Bozell III)

Having gone over the hypocrisy on this matter myself in recent months{1}, I am pleased to see others pointing this out also. The bottom line is, the law of non-contradiction is violated on this matter to no small degree by those who cheer for in President Obama what they were critical of in President Bush. For that reason if nothing else, such persons are without any credibility whatsoever.

Note:

{1} Points to Ponder on Presidential Hypocrisy (circa March 4, 2009)