"Crying 'Wolf'" Dept.(On
The DaVinci Code and Movie Protests in General)
I seem to be one of the few Christians who has not blown a gasket over the whole
DaVinci Code situation. Perhaps the reason for this is my
operative presupposition lo these many years of watching movies like this bomb at the box office time and again. That may explain part of it but the other is an instinct that the repetitive shrieking by various religious groups about the latest movie "abomination" almost always gives the movie in question publicity that it generally does not need. (The media maxim "there is no such thing as bad publicity" comes to mind here.)
That is not to say that on occasion it is not appropriate for practical or tactical reasons to register a public protest of course. And I would not be telling the truth if I did not admit that I
have on occasion done this -particularly in 2003 and 2004 with two movies that were released in 2004.{1} But those were
exceptions to the rule for reasons which I made clear in the respective postings dealing with them.{2}
It seems as obvious to me as the sun rising in the east every morning that a protest that has a hope of success needs to be carefully undertaken. That means picking targets with care and
not bitching and moaning about
every poorly made and religiously/morally objectionable movie that is made. For to do this is to emulate the fable about
The Boy Who Cried 'Wolf' and I cannot see how that helps in the culture wars.
But as usual though, Santatyana's dictum is probably going to be ignored by those who act in this fashion until the time a real wolf is at the doorstep...at which time no one will believe these people when they resort to their predictable whining and complaining yet again.
Notes:{1} Those movies were
The Passion of the Christ and
Fahrenheit 9/11. My reasons for selecting those movies can be ascertained in the threads listed below pertaining to each movie --not everything which was blogged on these matters at this humble weblog but certainly most of the postings:
The Passion of the ChristDialogue on Mel Gibson's Movie--Parts I-II (circa October 4-5, 2003)On "Traditionalism", "Antisemitism", and Mel Gibson (circa November 18, 2003)Miscellaneous Morning Musings on The Passion of the Christ (circa February 20, 2004)More on the Mel Gibson/Hutton Gibson situation (circa February 22, 2004)Guest Editorial on Mel Gibson's Passion of the Christ --By Mark Downey with Commentary by I. Shawn McElhinney (circa February 24, 2004)Briefly on The Passion of the Christ (circa March 2, 2004)Fahrenheit 9/11 and The Passion of the ChristA Tale of Two Movies: Fahrenheit 9/11 vs. The Passion of the Christ (circa July 15, 2004)Fahrenheit 9/11Some Links on Joseph Goebbels Reincarnated Michael Moore (circa June 27, 2004)Fifty-Nine Deceits in Fahrenheit 9/11 (circa August 24, 2004)Miscellaneous Thread For Viewing (circa October 18, 2004)A Weblog Amendment (circa October 22, 2004){2} Or in summary form, with Gibson's movie I did not feel the hubbub about it was warranted since (i) it started before the project was even completed and before the movie hit theatres and (ii) I was disgusted at the double standards employed by almost all of its critics. With the Moore movie it was another reason altogether: it got a ton of publicity and was packed with countless
Goebbelsian deceptions intended to sway a voting audience in a crucial election year. For that reason, I allowed the
Alexander Hamilton side to my tendencies a bit of free reign to do whatever I could do to undermine that movie having an effect.